FRENCH DEBATES AND AMERICAN DEBATES. Nicholas Sarkozy was elected President of France yesterday. Sarkozy and his opponent Segolene Royal held a debate during the week before the vote. French Presidential debates differ dramatically from American Presidential debates. The French candidates appear face to face without an intermediary and argue. We had the good fortune to be in France in 1981 and saw the televised debate between Mitterand and Giscard d’Estaing. My French wasn’t good enough to follow the debate, but I could tell that the two men had enough time to express their thoughts in complete paragraphs and were able to respond directly to each other’s arguments. American debates are really joint press conferences with no opportunity to develop an argument. I have always thought that American debates take the form they do because of the power of the television networks. The format makes the members of the press appearing on the show almost as important as the candidates.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- Gary Nuetzel on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Francesca on EATING PEAS WITH A KNIFE.
- avon wilsmore on CHEATING IN CHAMPIONSHIP BRIDGE.
- Anonymous on THE LANGUAGE WEIRDNESS INDEX.
- James Friscia on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Lickity Splitfingers on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
- Ken Babcock on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- David Quemere on THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT).
- Nicholas Schaefer on THE SECOND OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE.
Meta
Perhaps the American format allows less articulate/charismatic figures win elections. I’m not sure how well that works for the United States from a diplomatic standpoint.
A good point I hadn’t really thought about. The American Presidency calls for executive talent more than the French or English systems.
Philip: Explain your point!
I think the American format does not give a good opportunity to persuade by argument. I think the press gets in the way. I think this problem exists on TV generally. A candidate gets only a sound bite opportunity. For example, it was said that John Edwards strength in the last election was the coherence and persuasiveness of his 30 minute standard speech. I don’t think that he ever had more a couple minutes at a time to speak on national TV. I took Nick’s point to be that the American format may show the ability to make decisions and explain them in summary form. I can see that one might consider that more important in an executive, such as a governor, than the ability to persuade, which may be more of a senator’s skills. I can see the point, but I still would prefer a format that gave the candidates more time to speak.
Another part of my point was that they do lack the power of persuasion, and reasoning no longer has any relevance, only force of will. And I’m not so sure that’s a good thing. We’re no longer a weak nation that needs a “strong president” historians love so damned much.
Andrew Jackson was a “strong president” who flouted the Supreme Court, and inexplicably declared war on the national bank.
Philip: The point you need to explain is the following:
“The American Presidency calls for executive talent more than the French or English systems.”
Haha, I remember Mr. Burt’s (AP US History teacher) utter bafflement at how Jackson took on the bank. Wasn’t he quoted as saying, “I will kill it!”? He was one of the best teachers we ever had. Mr. Burt, not Andrew Jackson.
I don’t know, Annalisa. I heard Jackson was a notoriously easy grader.
(I’m sorry for such a worthless comment, Mr. S)
Lee, I did laugh out loud at your comment.
I’m glad it wasn’t a throwaway comment! I should also reassure everyone that easy grading is NOT one of my criteria for being a good teacher.
Pingback: Pater Familias » PRESIDENTS AND PRIME MINISTERS.
Pingback: Pater Familias » NARROW DEBATES.
Pingback: Pater Familias » PRESS INTERVENTION IN THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES.
Pingback: WHY JOURNALISTS SHOULD NOT MODERATE DEBATES. | Pater Familias
Pingback: PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES AS SPORTING EVENTS. | Pater Familias
Pingback: MY IDEAL DEBATE—NO MODERATOR. | Pater Familias