Comments on: DAVID HARE AGREES WITH ME. http://philipschaefer.com/2007/03/24/david-hare-agrees-with-me/ Theories, observations, and articles Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:55:54 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Pater Familias » IS THE NEW YORK TIMES THE ARBITER OF TASTE AND CULTURE? http://philipschaefer.com/2007/03/24/david-hare-agrees-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-206 Pater Familias » IS THE NEW YORK TIMES THE ARBITER OF TASTE AND CULTURE? Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:16:28 +0000 http://philipschaefer.com/2007/03/24/david-hare-agrees-with-me/#comment-206 [...] NEW YORK? John Gapper has an article in the Financial Times today which discusses a quote which I linked to last week. Gapper says, “…the New York Times rules. As Jill Abramson, its managing [...] [...] NEW YORK? John Gapper has an article in the Financial Times today which discusses a quote which I linked to last week. Gapper says, “…the New York Times rules. As Jill Abramson, its managing [...]

]]> By: Lee http://philipschaefer.com/2007/03/24/david-hare-agrees-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-165 Lee Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:30:08 +0000 http://philipschaefer.com/2007/03/24/david-hare-agrees-with-me/#comment-165 Wow, the Times is arrogant even when dealing with sports? I hear you get a free lifetime subscription if you can tell the front page from the editorial section. Wow, the Times is arrogant even when dealing with sports? I hear you get a free lifetime subscription if you can tell the front page from the editorial section.

]]> By: Nick http://philipschaefer.com/2007/03/24/david-hare-agrees-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-164 Nick Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:45:28 +0000 http://philipschaefer.com/2007/03/24/david-hare-agrees-with-me/#comment-164 For all that people fall over themselves to praise the Times, I have yet to hear anything good about it, or read anything in it that impressed me. Even Curt Schilling called out the Times for the willful, stubborn, and (shocker!) arrogant ignorance with which Murray Chass covered baseball and its new statistics. For all that people fall over themselves to praise the Times, I have yet to hear anything good about it, or read anything in it that impressed me.

Even Curt Schilling called out the Times for the willful, stubborn, and (shocker!) arrogant ignorance with which Murray Chass covered baseball and its new statistics.

]]>