<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PEOPLE ARE ALREADY USED TO PROBABILITIES.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/</link>
	<description>Theories, observations, and articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:04:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: USING PROBABILITIES IN INTELLIGENCE&#8212;FINDING BIN LADEN. &#124; Pater Familias</title>
		<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-8555</link>
		<dc:creator>USING PROBABILITIES IN INTELLIGENCE&#8212;FINDING BIN LADEN. &#124; Pater Familias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 16:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/#comment-8555</guid>
		<description>[...] PROBABILITIES IN INTELLIGENCE&#8212;FINDING BIN LADEN. I posted here three years ago arguing for using probabilities more in evaluating foreign intelligence decisions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PROBABILITIES IN INTELLIGENCE&#8212;FINDING BIN LADEN. I posted here three years ago arguing for using probabilities more in evaluating foreign intelligence decisions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RATING AGENCIES SHOULD USE PROBABILITIES. &#124; Pater Familias</title>
		<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>RATING AGENCIES SHOULD USE PROBABILITIES. &#124; Pater Familias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>[...] AGENCIES SHOULD USE PROBABILITIES. I posted here that intelligence estimates by the CIA should be expressed in terms of probabilities just as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AGENCIES SHOULD USE PROBABILITIES. I posted here that intelligence estimates by the CIA should be expressed in terms of probabilities just as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE INFLUENCE OF PHILOSOPHERS. &#124; Pater Familias</title>
		<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>THE INFLUENCE OF PHILOSOPHERS. &#124; Pater Familias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 02:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>[...] that I considered common sense or received wisdom had originated with the Enlightenment. I argued here that public policy could and should be debated in terms of the probabilities the speakers attached [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that I considered common sense or received wisdom had originated with the Enlightenment. I argued here that public policy could and should be debated in terms of the probabilities the speakers attached [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pater Familias &#187; DISCUSSING RECESSION IN TERMS OF PROBABILITIES.</title>
		<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Pater Familias &#187; DISCUSSING RECESSION IN TERMS OF PROBABILITIES.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/#comment-867</guid>
		<description>[...] RECESSION IN TERMS OF PROBABILITIES. About a year ago, I argued here that it would be useful to use probabilities to discuss foreign intelligence, just as we have over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RECESSION IN TERMS OF PROBABILITIES. About a year ago, I argued here that it would be useful to use probabilities to discuss foreign intelligence, just as we have over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pater Familias &#187; ARE EXPERTS NO GOOD? (COMMENT)</title>
		<link>http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Pater Familias &#187; ARE EXPERTS NO GOOD? (COMMENT)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 22:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipschaefer.com/2007/02/10/people-are-already-used-to-probabilities/#comment-792</guid>
		<description>[...] their reputational bets.&#8217;” I argued for greater use of probabilities in discussing policies here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their reputational bets.&#8217;” I argued for greater use of probabilities in discussing policies here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

