PROUST AND NEUROSCIENCE BY AN EXPERT. I posted earlier on Proust and Happiness Psychology. This was a layman’s reaction to reading STUMBLING ON HAPPINESS by Daniel Gilbert. In reading about Milton Friedman just now I came across the fact that Jonah Lehrer will be publishing a book entitled PROUST WAS A NEUROSCIENTIST later this year. Jonah Lehrer has a blog called The Frontal Cortex which discusses Proust and neuroscience. He says, “I actually argue that Proust anticipated some fundamental discoveries in modern neuroscience. But he wasn’t the only artist with prophetic powers. I also argue that Walt Whitman, George Eliot, August Escoffier, Paul Cezanne, Igor Stravinsky, Gertrude Stein and Virginia Woolf (basically a Who’s Who of modernism) also anticipated the shiny new facts of neuroscience.” You can imagine how much I am looking forward to this book.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
What a perfect book for you! I’m looking forward to hearing your reactions to it when it comes out. Back when I was in BSCS I kept hoping we would spend more time on how the brain functions. Also, I love the idea of artists and other creative types anticipating scientific discoveries based on their powers of observation and use of anecdotal evidence.
My Eastern Religions teacher posited that Buddhism was an early form of neuroscience, with its delving into the concept of the mind and self-consciousness. A little while later I find that someone’s written a book on the very same premise.
Pingback: Pater Familias » UPDATE – PROUST WAS A NEUROSCIENTIST HAS BEEN PUBLISHED.
Pingback: JONAH LEHRER ON THE SCIENCE OF NEW YEAR’S RESOLUTIONS. | Pater Familias