UNFASHIONABLE VIEWS ON DRUG PRICES AND THE PUBLIC GOOD. My first postings have taken strong stands against corruption and political assassination. Now I reveal some unfashionable views. I am for personal reasons very much in favor of the traditional patent system to encourage new drugs, and therefore I am in favor of high and monopolistic prices for new drugs. I also believe that somebody who chooses employment to make the most money is in fact doing what other people in society want done as expressed in market prices and is therefore serving the public interest. Thomas Sowell and other economists have pointed this out. I make these confessions now in response to this article in the NEW YORK TIMES. The leading figure in the story apologizes, and the article implicitly criticizes him for, his choice of his current job, in which he is evidently making a lot of money. His job is to evaluate drugs that startup companies are developing. I cannot think of a more important job in our society, and I am glad that such people are highly compensated. And I am a little frightened that there are those who take it for granted that it is a bad thing that very talented people are being drawn to these jobs.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- ADAPTING GATSBY. (1)
- Mary Jane Schaefer: I think these are crucial, important decisions, what to leave out of any literary work, maybe any...
- DAMIEN HIRST—AN ART MARKET BUBBLE?. (1)
- Kate Bush: I hope you enjoy my visit to the Damien Hirst show as much as I did The Technical Impossibility of...
- THE MOST IMPORTANT EPISODE OF THE SIMPSONS ? (COMMENT). (1)
- Nick: Homer does has success as the team’s best hitter until Mr. Burns places a bet with a rival factory owner...
- THE “RIGHT TO EDIT”. (1)
- Lee: A relevant Simpsons clip.
- ULYSSES—VIRGINIA WOOLF LIKED THE BOOK, DESPISED THE AUTHOR. (3)
- A DEFENSE OF INVASIVE SPECIES. (3)
- Dick Weisfelder: Today’s Toledo Blade has an article on the importation of live Asian carp to Canada to serve...
- Lee: The downside is that red squirrels are way cuter than their gray cousins. Hitchens on the subject.
- THE OLDEST FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE STARTS ITS 32ND SEASON. (COMMENT). (5)
- frank martin: Have been in a an Al only Roto league since 91… started at Ohio University were we all went to...
- DEATH OF A BUMBLEBEE. (1)
- Nick: By contrast, I remember witnessing the entire thing. I was surprised by Annalisa’s reaction and...
- ANOTHER VOTE ON UMBRIDGE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: When I look back at one of the Potter books, it’s usually this one. There are just a lot of...
- THE SCARIEST VILLAIN IN HARRY POTTER? (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: Didn’t we all meet her somewhere in grade or high school?
- ADAPTING GATSBY. (1)
Meta
Since I was raised by an economist, I am always amazed when people don’t look at situations like this with an economist’s point of view. If drug developers get paid richly for their services, their services must be valuable. Of course, I depart from this way of thinking sometimes, as I view celebrities’ huge salaries with a skeptical eye. I don’t understand why Julia Roberts should be paid more than an outstanding brain surgeon or even an inspiring college professor. Perhaps further study in economics is necessary in order for me to understand this.