UNFASHIONABLE VIEWS ON DRUG PRICES AND THE PUBLIC GOOD. My first postings have taken strong stands against corruption and political assassination. Now I reveal some unfashionable views. I am for personal reasons very much in favor of the traditional patent system to encourage new drugs, and therefore I am in favor of high and monopolistic prices for new drugs. I also believe that somebody who chooses employment to make the most money is in fact doing what other people in society want done as expressed in market prices and is therefore serving the public interest. Thomas Sowell and other economists have pointed this out. I make these confessions now in response to this article in the NEW YORK TIMES. The leading figure in the story apologizes, and the article implicitly criticizes him for, his choice of his current job, in which he is evidently making a lot of money. His job is to evaluate drugs that startup companies are developing. I cannot think of a more important job in our society, and I am glad that such people are highly compensated. And I am a little frightened that there are those who take it for granted that it is a bad thing that very talented people are being drawn to these jobs.
Categories
Archives
Recent Comments
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
- Nick: Further informing my perspective was that in the writings of classical Romans the middle-aged authors opined...
- ARE PEOPLE LESS VIOLENT? (COMMENT). (2)
- Dick Weisfelder: My prior comment was just in the context of sports. Whether or not from Pinker, I have seen the...
- erik: It seems doubtful that human nature has changed. The most likely explanation would be that modern culture gives...
- HOW BANKS PREPARED FOR A U.S. DEFAULT. (2)
- GREECE’S ADVANTAGE IN THE CHICKEN GAME. (2)
- Nick: That makes sense. It reminds me of the stories Pater Familias would tell me about how in Boston the person with...
- Dick Weisfelder: Greece seems to me to be playing a game that Karl Deutsch called “underdog.” While one...
- FOOTBALL PLAYERS DELIBERATELY CAUSING CONCUSSIONS? (3)
- Nick: It was my understanding that boxing gloves were to protect the puncher’s hands and not the...
- Dick Weisfelder: Remember the Roman arenas? Bare knuckled boxing? Such injuries were taken as natural and accepted in...
- Mary Jane Schaefer: This isn’t about football. Or even sportsmanship. Well, it is about sportsmanship. But what...
- A 25 % CHANCE OF A EURO DEFAULT? (1)
- Nick: The fact that this has gone on for so long is pretty perplexing. The Economist is referring back to articles it...
- DECIDING WHAT KIND OF PATIENT YOU ARE. (1)
- Dick Weisfelder: One can be very open to new technology, but also risk averse. The recent debates about how to...
- “A COMFORT BLANKET FOR THE SMUG”? (1)
Meta
Since I was raised by an economist, I am always amazed when people don’t look at situations like this with an economist’s point of view. If drug developers get paid richly for their services, their services must be valuable. Of course, I depart from this way of thinking sometimes, as I view celebrities’ huge salaries with a skeptical eye. I don’t understand why Julia Roberts should be paid more than an outstanding brain surgeon or even an inspiring college professor. Perhaps further study in economics is necessary in order for me to understand this.